Learn how to make cash using Twitter
First and foremost this case is so bizzare that i hat to come to yahoo answers of all places.
I am guilty of grand theft.
I stole a laptop from a girls house that i was talking to. Turns out to be her fathers lap top, they report it. Police begin investigating, the girl never tells them that i was there in fear her parents would find out, i end up selling it and get in trouble. I tell them what happend and after some consulting acquired a lawyer. They report to the family and the girl tells them that i raped her and have been for a long time. THey file a restraining order, that is granted after a few court dates. Im charged with grand theft by this time..in the mean time my lawyer is dealing with this girls parents who are enraged and want to hang me because they thing i took advantage of there daughter. THe mother starts coming to all my cases. No rape charges have been filled. the Ls said nothign can b done about the rape talk untill charges are brought forth. after the few first dates my lawyer gets a meeting they make a deal on 3 months house arrest a year probation. i have no prior criminal record. We go to court to set and find out the DA revoked the deal. court is then postponed, THe deal is revoked on the grounds that someone put this girls information on craigslist and the cops were notified and they immediately thought it was me. we go to court again and the da hasnt had time to look at the file. The day after that meeting the cops come to my house and say they have search warrent for child pornography, (plot ensues)…it turns out that my lawyer, in a conversation with the girls family in talkin about her posting ridiculous photos on facebook and ridiculous twitters also mentioed that i made a tape of us two fooling around where she is obviously being consensual…the family confronts the girl and she tells them that she was underage in it! cops arrived bright and early right after i get off graveyard, the cop and me talk a little outside the main detective whos been dealing with the case and he says that he doubts there will be another case (rape case) aside from the grand theft. He says the girl is afraid of her father.(Good cop bad cop?)..they take the tape. I have not heard from the cops in over a month. THe da notified my lawyer that he was waiting from the polices investigation on the tape to be finished and the would take it from there…i have court in a few days and my lawyers been checking every day for any new charges, none! and wating word from the da whom hes been calling every other day and emailing aswell. My questions…
1) What does someone whos been thru the legal system think?
2) Does the police taking so long to investigate this fake child pornography mean that there will be no charges?
3)Gettin old deal? more? or even less if lawyer pushes the card that its been being postponed over this girls lies long enough?
4) The likelihood of rape charges?
Yes, it's no secret that Twitter can be a tremendous time-suck. But imagine getting paid for wasting those precious minutes of your day. Thanks to companies that are desperate to reach consumers in the social-media crowd, it's now possible to make a buck or two — or much more — on Twitter.
4 Responses to Just Wondering If Someone Could Share Some Legal Insight On My Case…?
Joe D
February 26th, 2010 at 5:59 am
Yahoo answers of all places……uhhhhh…..I think we here at Yahoo answers are pretty cool!
What do I think, well, you got a mess! I think you should get your attorney for “dropping” the fact that there was a tape in the first place, when you mentioned there, at that point, had been nothing formally done regarding a rape. That might be considered professional misconduct as he should have never opened his mouth. I would talk to him about that and maybe a reduction of fees or something as you didnt have to deal with this porn thing had he not brought it into the picture. Paying for a defense HE CREATED is BS.
You never mentioned how old the girl was, just that she was a minor. But I am assuming she is at least 16. Even though it is technically child porn, it is obviously consentual and the girl is not that young….Like a child or something. I think those two aspects will help as teens nowadays are “Sexting” and everything else, so society and the police are not as concerned as they are when they are very small. Quite different. Regarding the taking so long, they are probably just busy with other cases that are more important or more severe, ACTUAL childporn cases or more pending criminal cases…..thats all. Again, you have to take into consideration many factors, are you in a big city or small town. Big cities are used to these things, whereas small towns havent seen much and are more likely to charge at least something, maybe. Make sense? But I think in the end, the girl is allowing it and is probably close to her age of majority anyway. Its not like she wasnt a willing party to the whole thing. Definately a mitigating factor.
Your lawyer can push the card as much as he wants, but the DA will take as long as the court allows postponements. And if they keep allowing it, so be it. You just have to wait. You see, it could work both ways if your attorney needed more time to get your defense, so postponements are a ***** in that you are hanging not knowing what is going on while time seems to keep going and going and going. Very stressful, but pretty much part of the way the system works. Sometimes years go by before it is resolved. But if the attorney really gets tired of it, he can file to get a summary judgment, which means a ruling on what they have accumulated to that point. They may just give you the old deal to clear their calander and close the case with the original theft charge as I dont see how you are going to get out of that one. The others, maybe, probabaly, but not the theft.
But again, let me emphasize that this attorney was out of line when he spoke and brought this whole thing about the porn into focus. Dont let him BS you, as they love to do that when they make a mistake and THEY DO MAKE MISTAKES! He should have kept it to himself and then you would have only had to deal with the possible rape and theft. The porn would have been left out. Especially since at that point, nothing had been charged regarding the rape. When or if they charged the rape, he should have CONSIDERED mentioning the video, but totally NOT BEFORE. Do you see? He was out of line. AND to add insult to injury, he is charging you to defend you for something HE CREATED. I would have a nice little conversation with this guy…..You have a nice case for attorney misconduct and every state has a place to file complaints, which I know he would not want. Mention this and it might just get him off his butt and do something good for you as now his butt is on the line….You would be amazed when you put their butt in the fire along with yours.
Hey good luck and dont steal any more laptops nor date underage girls…..let this be a lesson.
Grandview Investigations
February 26th, 2010 at 6:13 am
Prosecution – not you – is required to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. If prosc has not charged you with an offense, you are not required to answer the charge. Period. Only evidence relevant to the offenses with which you are ultimately charged will be permitted at trial – as long as atty gets up on his hind legs ready to fight, which is his role in all of this. Laws affecting Facebook and other social networks are evolving daily to protect vulnerable (stupid, usually young) people against exactly what has occurred here . It’s quite likely you’ll face further charges over this tortured fact pattern but, if so, you’ll certainly be notified and atty will no doubt ask the court for whatever time is required to prepare an adequate defense. There is no statute of limitations precluding a criminal prosecution but there is the double jeopardy rule to prevent accused from having to answer twice to the same fact pattern, so cops will have to get it right the first time. That said, however, if new evidence comes to light later and it’s such that it might have influenced outcome had it been known to the court at the time of trial, you could face a new trial.
leo@askb
February 26th, 2010 at 6:26 am
I hope you learned your lesson about fooling around with underaged girls. Statuatory rape may be in play. If the girls is underaged in you video you are screwed. 5 years minimum in federal prison. See Bob Gamer of boston who plead guilty yesterday.
Jodi H
February 26th, 2010 at 6:44 am
Why would you keep the tape to begin with, after you had already been charged with grand theft? That makes no sense. You shouldn’t have stole the computer and then you probably wouldn’t be in any trouble at all right now. Don’t steal!